A Dozen Uncommon Facts About Dogs

**Related Articles:**



&nbsp_place_holder; [Assistance Dogs Change Lives](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/09/19/assistance-dogs.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [How Dogs Help Us Heal and Give Us Hope](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/09/17/rachel-mcpherson-interview.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [New Insight into Why Your Dog Misbehaves and Gets Sick](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/08/23/serendipitous-meeting-that-began-teds-devotion-to-merle.aspx)

URL: http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/02/01/12-uncommon-dog-facts.aspx

Toxic Chicken Jerky Pet Treats Pulled from Store Shelves!

**By Dr. Becker**

> In a truly spectacular coincidence, the very same [brands](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/04/13/pet-owners-vs-chicken-pet-treats.aspx) of chicken jerky treats suspected of causing sickness and death in hundreds of dogs since 2007 have now been identified as being possibly contaminated with "unapproved" antibiotics. (Apparently the antibiotics are approved for use in China, where the treats are made, and in other countries, but not in the U.S.)
>
> According to NBC News, right after the first of the year, the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets (NYSDAM) informed the FDA it had found trace amounts of residual poultry antibiotics in several lots of Waggin' Train and Canyon Creek Ranch brand dog treats, as well as Milo's Kitchen Chicken Jerky and Chicken Grillers home-style dog treats.

## Treats Have Been Voluntarily Recalled

> Fortunately for U.S. pet owners and potential future pet victims, it seems the suggestion of antibiotic contamination was enough to prompt Nestle Purina PetCare (makers of Waggin' Train and Canyon Creek Ranch jerky treats) and the Del Monte Corp. (makers of Milo's Kitchen products) to voluntarily pull their chicken jerky products from store shelves across the country.
>
> The New York agriculture agency discovered very low levels of four drugs not approved for use in U.S. poultry, and one antibiotic that is approved for use, but for which quantities are strictly limited. The antibiotics found were sulfaclozine, tilmicosin, trimethoprim, enrofloxacin and sulfaquinoxaline.
>
> The agency used new, highly sensitive technology to detect the presence of the antibiotics. The tests on the jerky treats were conducted in response to "growing consumer concerns."
>
> Whatever the reason, I'm extremely thankful NYSDAM took it upon themselves to run the tests. And while discovering antibiotic residue in food products is never "good news," I'm grateful, in this case, something was found in those treats that caused them to be pulled off the market.

## Treat Manufacturers and FDA Make Predictable Public Response

> Needless to say, a spokesman for Nestle Purina says the issue with the antibiotics is in no way related to the issue with these very same chicken jerky treats that have allegedly sickened over 2,200 pets and killed well over 300.
>
> The FDA also weighed in. From the agency's January 9 [CVM update](http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/NewsEvents/CVMUpdates/ucm334944.htm):
>
>> _ Based on the FDA's review of the NYSDAM results, there is no evidence that raises health concerns, and these results are highly unlikely to be related to the reports of illnesses FDA has received related to jerky pet treats. FDA commends Del Monte and Nestle-Purina for withdrawing these products from the market in response to this product quality issue. FDA also welcomes additional information about NYSDAM's testing methodology, which is different and reportedly more sensitive than currently validated and approved regulatory methods._
>
> As those of you who have been following this fiasco are aware, the FDA has conducted its own "extensive" testing and has to date been unable to find anything in the chicken jerky treats that would cause pet illness or death. Consequently, the agency maintains it is unable to take action to get the treats recalled, or even to effectively warn consumers of the potential for harm to their pets.

## At Least for Now, Suspect Treats Are Off Store Shelves

> It's a small victory, but one that brings a sigh of relief. Tragically, for those pet owners who lost beloved companions, the recall does not help.
>
> According to NBC news, a&nbsp_place_holder;woman from New York whose 2 year-old pug died suddenly in 2011 after eating Waggin' Train chicken jerky treats, said in a statement:
>
>> _ "How many lives could have been saved if, six years ago, when there was first doubt that the safety of our companions was compromised, the FDA and all manufacturers of imported chicken jerky had issued a precautionary recall until the toxin was found? How much pain and suffering could have been avoided if only they had met their moral obligation six years ago and did the job the taxpayers pay them to do?"_





Sources:

* [NBCNews.com January 9, 2013](http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/09/16433840-firms-withdraw-chicken-jerky-pet-treats-over-antibiotics?lite&ocid=msnhp&pos=4)


**Related Articles:**



&nbsp_place_holder; [Warning: If You Feed Your Pet These Popular Treats - Please Stop Now](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/12/22/china-chicken-jerky-treats-bad-for-pets.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [FDA Releases Chicken Jerky Treat Test Results](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/07/27/chicken-jerky-treats-test-results.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [If You Feed Sweet Potato Treats to Your Pet, Please Read This!](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/07/20/sweet-potato-dog-treats.aspx)



[**&nbsp_place_holder;Comments&nbsp_place_holder;(2)](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/02/01/toxic-chicken-jerky-pet-treats.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#comments)**

URL: http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/02/01/toxic-chicken-jerky-pet-treats.aspx

Bowie Loves Angry Bird

Bowie the parrot is fascinated with his new Angry Bird toy. He asks "What's that?" when his mom shows him the toy. Then he asks "Touch?" His mom says yes, he can touch Angry Bird, so Bowie scratches the toy with his beak and says "Tickle, tickle."

URL: http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/02/01/bowie-loves-angry-bird.aspx

Puppy Bowl IX: Pics of the litter

Puppy Bowl IX is Animal Planet's answer to the Super Bowl. The battle of the cute airs repeatedly on Sunday.

URL: http://www.topix.com/pets/2013/01/puppy-bowl-ix-pics-of-the-litter?fromrss=1
Enclosure: http://www.topix.com/bigpic/mini-6505fc41019f969c96a20fbc25599044

Salmonella Undermines Hedgehogs' Cuteness Overload

We have no reason to think this little guy isn't clean as a whistle, but some hedgehogs carry salmonella.

URL: http://www.topix.com/pets/2013/01/salmonella-undermines-hedgehogs-cuteness-overload?fromrss=1
Enclosure: http://www.topix.com/bigpic/mini-515c71b0208f740374eee21016ce1ec2

Shot: Minding Nemo

Pet fish face a rough ride when shipped from their home waters to aquariums around the world.

URL: http://www.topix.com/pets/2013/01/shot-minding-nemo?fromrss=1

Owner of horse stuck on five-bar gate given five-year ban

The owner of a stallion found by a British RSPCA inspector after seriously damaging his genitals trying to jump a five-bar gate has been banned for keeping horses for five years.

URL: http://www.topix.com/pets/2013/01/owner-of-horse-stuck-on-five-bar-gate-given-five-year-ban?fromrss=1

Want Your Own Spirit Animal? 5 Great 'Ghost Dog' Alternatives

That's wonderful! We applaud you. Statistically though, it probably won't happen.

URL: http://www.topix.com/pets/2013/01/want-your-own-spirit-animal-5-great-ghost-dog-alternatives?fromrss=1

Caption This: A Dog and Its Little Buddy

Patch readers, you're up! We need your wit, creativity and animal psychic abilities to craft the perfect caption for the next edition of our pet photo caption challenge! What's this pup thinking, as it cuddles up with his buddy? Suggest your caption in the Comments section below.

URL: http://www.topix.com/pets/2013/01/caption-this-a-dog-and-its-little-buddy?fromrss=1

If You Feed Salmon to Your Pet (or Eat It Yourself), Please Read This

**By Dr. Becker**

> The week before Christmas, the FDA determined that the first genetically engineered (G.E.) animal - a type of salmon - will have "no significant impact" on the environment, and will be "as safe as food from conventional Atlantic salmon."
>
> The FDA's draft environmental assessment[1](http://healthypets.mercola.com/rss/healthypet-rss.aspx#_edn1) will be open for public comment for two months, but according to the New York Times, it seems likely the salmon will be approved in the not-too-distant future. (Interestingly, the assessment was completed in early May, but wasn't released until after the presidential election in November. According to the NYTimes, proponents of the salmon believe the delay was due to fear by the Obama administration that unfavorable consumer reaction could have an impact on the outcome of the election.)

## According to the FDA, G.E. Salmon is Safe to Eat and No Risk to the Environment

> AquaBounty Technologies is the company that developed the product, called the AquAdvantage salmon. They have been trying to get FDA approval of the salmon for around 15 years.
>
> According to the NYTimes, the AquAdvantage salmon _"… is an Atlantic salmon that contains a growth hormone gene from the Chinook salmon and a genetic switch from the ocean pout, an eel-like creature. The switch keeps the gene on so that the salmon produces growth hormone year round, rather than only during warm weather. The fish reach market weight in about 18 months instead of three years."_
>
> The FDA's environmental analysis of the G.E. salmon looked at whether the fish could escape, adapt to life in the wild, and have a negative impact on the environment. One concern is whether the much larger AquAdvantage salmon could spell disaster for the wild Atlantic salmon by taking its food and mates.
>
> The FDA concluded the risk of negatively affecting the environment is "extremely remote." It states the salmon will be raised in inland tanks with little to no means of escape, and in the event of escape, the fish wouldn't live long due to the warm temperatures and saltiness of nearby bodies of water. The agency also claims the G.E. salmon would be unlikely to reproduce because they would be sterilized, however, according to the Times, the sterilization method is not foolproof.
>
> The FDA believes the salmon would have no effect on endangered species, including wild Atlantic salmon. Apparently the National Marine Fisheries Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service did not take issue with the FDA's opinion.

## Opponents of "Frankenfish" Vehemently Disagree with the FDA's Assessment

> According to the Huffington Post, critics of the genetically engineered salmon, _"… worry that it could cause human allergies and the eventual decimation of the natural salmon population if it escapes and breeds in the wild."_
>
> Opponents think the FDA should compile a more comprehensive environmental impact statement. They feel not enough samples were studied to conclude that the fish would be safe to eat.
>
> Others opposed to the breeding of engineered animals believe it's an issue of ethics.
>
>> _"The G.E. salmon has no socially redeeming value," _Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of the Center for Food Safety (CFS), a Washington advocacy group opposed to farm biotechnology, said in a statement._ "It's bad for the consumer, bad for the salmon industry and bad for the environment. F.D.A.'s decision is premature and misguided." _
>
> In a December 21st [press release](http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/2012/12/21/obama-administration-snubs-risks-moves-forward-with-ge-salmon-approval/), the CFS blasted the FDA:
>
>> _"The FDA decision ignores calls from more than forty members of the U.S. Congress who have repeatedly urged FDA to conduct more rigorous review of environmental and health safety, and halt any approval process until concerns over risks, transparency and oversight have been fully satisfied. The public filed nearly 400,000 comments demanding FDA reject this application. Additionally, more than 300 environmental, consumer, health and animal welfare organizations, salmon and fishing groups and associations, food companies, chefs and restaurants filed joint statements with FDA opposing approval."_
>
> You can learn more details about the potential risks of genetically engineered salmon at the [Ocean Conservancy](http://www.oceanconservancy.org/our-work/aquaculture/aquaculture-genetically.html), the "Stop GE Fish" page at the [Center for Food Safety](http://ge-fish.org/), and by reading Dr. Mercola's excellent article, [Act Now to Stop Genetically Engineered Fish from Receiving Approval](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/01/08/genetically-engineered-fish.aspx).

## Feeding Salmon to Your Pet

> As some of you may be aware, I don't recommend feeding a lot of fish-based commercial pet foods to your dog or cat. I explain why in [this article](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx).
>
> But since fish are a rich source of [omega-3 fatty acids](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/04/12/coat-and-skin-flakiness-and-irritation-problems-in-pets.aspx), which are essential to your pet's well-being, if you do want to supplement your pet's diet with fish, I suggest you go with sardines packed in water. Sardines don't live long enough to store toxins in their bodies, and they're an excellent source of omega-3s.
>
> I have also always recommended feeding wild caught salmon in rotation with other proteins, however, should G.E. salmon be given the green light, I'll have to revisit my position on this subject. It's entirely possible we won't be able to tell by reading labels whether we're serving our pets (or ourselves) real salmon or "frankenfish."
>
> If you choose not to feed any fish to your dog or cat, I certainly recommend you supplement your pet's diet with krill oil or another omega-3 fatty acid.

Sources:

* [The New York Times, December 21, 2012](http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/business/gene-altered-fish-moves-closer-to-federal-approval.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1356223845-qatvLZoWoOq9R5yPS870MA&)
* [Huffington Post, December 21, 2012](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/aquaadvantage-genetically-modified-salmon-no-threat_n_2347757.html)


**Related Articles:**

&nbsp_place_holder; [If You Love Eating Fish - Now is the Time to Stop This Health Hazard](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/10/06/gmo-salmon-one-step-closer-to-fda-approval.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [Warning - The Very Food Your Pet is Addicted to May Contain This Deadly Preservative](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [The Dangers of Genetically Modified Ingredients in Pet Food](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/11/14/genetically-modified-corn.aspx)

[**&nbsp_place_holder;Comments&nbsp_place_holder;(36)](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#comments)**

URL: http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx

Are Your Pet’s Toys Toxic?

**By Dr. Becker**

> According to the results of a study presented at a Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry conference in California last month, certain types of toys can be toxic to your pet.

## Do Dog Toys Contain Toxins That Can Enter Your Pet's Body?

> Philip Smith, co-author of the study and an associate professor at Texas Tech University, also raises, trains and hunts with Labrador Retrievers.
>
> Smith and his colleague, Kimberly Wooten, suspected that certain types of toys, including "bumpers" or fetching batons that are used to teach dogs to retrieve, might contain toxins that could leak into the mouths and bodies of dogs.
>
> In a press release Smith explained that:
>
>> _"In the process of training a lab, you do a lot of work with these plastic bumpers. I have a lot of bumpers in my garage, and they spend a lot of time in the mouths of my retrievers. Well, lots of attention has been given to chemicals in plastics lately regarding their effects on humans. Since we all care about our dogs, and we want them to be as healthy and smart and well-behaved as possible, we decided to look into this."_
>
> Chemicals called phthalates as well as bisphenol A (BPA) are used in plastics manufacturing to provide elasticity to products. These substances are known [endocrine disruptors](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/04/20/real-story-anubis.aspx) that mimic estrogen or act as anti-androgens.

## Watch Out for Aging, Weathered Toys

> The study involved creating "faux" dog saliva and also simulated chewing action. The chewing was accomplished by squeezing the toys with salad tongs. Some of the toys were also left outside in the elements to see if older toys leached more chemicals.
>
>> _"We found that aging or weathering the toys increased concentrations of BPA and phthalates,"_ Smith said. _"The toys had lower concentrations of phthalates than the bumpers, so that's good news. But they also had some other chemicals that mimicked estrogen. We need to find out what those are."_
>
> According to Wooten, BPA and phthalates can impact a developing fetus and have lifelong effects on the offspring of lab animals. And the U.S. government banned the use of BPA in baby bottles last year.
>
>> _"The interaction of pet health and environmental chemicals is understudied,"_ Wooten said. _"What may be a safe dose for one species isn't always a good measure for another species. But the amount of BPA and phthalates we found from the bumpers would be considered on the high end of what you might find in children's toys." _

## Finding Safer Toys for Your Pet

> Look for toys labeled "BPA Free" or made in the U.S. from 100 percent natural rubber. Some manufacturers to check out:
>
> * [Planet Dog](http://www.planetdog.com/home/)
> * [West Paw Design](http://www.westpawdesign.com/)
> * [Jolly Pets](http://jollypets.com/)
> * [Simply Fido](http://www.simplyfido.com/)
> * [Katie's Bumpers](http://www.katiesbumpers.com/index.htm)
>
>> _Please note: I'm not endorsing any particular product... it just happens that one of the companies in the above list, West Paw Design, has lots of YouTube videos of dogs playing with their non-toxic toys._

Sources:

* [Discovery News December 11, 2012](http://news.discovery.com/animals/dog-toys-chemicals-121211.html#mkcpgn=rssnws1)
* [Texas Tech Today December 11, 2012](http://today.ttu.edu/2012/12/researchers-find-potentially-dangerous-chemicals-in-dog-training-batons/)


**Related Articles:**

&nbsp_place_holder; [Here's One Protein Dog and Cat Owners Should Steer Clear Of](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/03/28/avoid-using-soy-on-pets.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [Bizarre Things You Didn't Know about This Popular Weed Killer](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2010/03/24/bizarre-things-you-didnt-know-about-this-popular-weed-killer.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [If Your Cat Has a Thyroid Problem, You Should Read This](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2099/11/30/flame-retardant-chemicals-affect-thyroid.aspx)

[**&nbsp_place_holder;Comments&nbsp_place_holder;(2)](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/toxic-pet-toys.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#comments)**

URL: http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/toxic-pet-toys.aspx

Galloping grannies blaze trail to shops

A GROUP of women who still love to ride horses despite their advancing years will be trotting into a Bolton shopping centre.

URL: http://www.topix.com/pets/2013/01/galloping-grannies-blaze-trail-to-shops?fromrss=1

One Horse Found Dead, Others Starving, In Limestone County

Limestone County Sheriff's Deputies were faced with a sad sight, when they responded to a call of a dead horse in a Ham Road pasture.

URL: http://www.topix.com/pets/2013/01/one-horse-found-dead-others-starving-in-limestone-county?fromrss=1

If You Feed Salmon to Your Pet (or Eat It Yourself), Please Read This

**By Dr. Becker**

> The week before Christmas, the FDA determined that the first genetically engineered (G.E.) animal - a type of salmon - will have "no significant impact" on the environment, and will be "as safe as food from conventional Atlantic salmon."
>
> The FDA's draft environmental assessment[1](http://healthypets.mercola.com/rss/healthypet-rss.aspx#_edn1) will be open for public comment for two months, but according to the New York Times, it seems likely the salmon will be approved in the not-too-distant future. (Interestingly, the assessment was completed in early May, but wasn't released until after the presidential election in November. According to the NYTimes, proponents of the salmon believe the delay was due to fear by the Obama administration that unfavorable consumer reaction could have an impact on the outcome of the election.)

## According to the FDA, G.E. Salmon is Safe to Eat and No Risk to the Environment

> AquaBounty Technologies is the company that developed the product, called the AquAdvantage salmon. They have been trying to get FDA approval of the salmon for around 15 years.
>
> According to the NYTimes, the AquAdvantage salmon _"… is an Atlantic salmon that contains a growth hormone gene from the Chinook salmon and a genetic switch from the ocean pout, an eel-like creature. The switch keeps the gene on so that the salmon produces growth hormone year round, rather than only during warm weather. The fish reach market weight in about 18 months instead of three years."_
>
> The FDA's environmental analysis of the G.E. salmon looked at whether the fish could escape, adapt to life in the wild, and have a negative impact on the environment. One concern is whether the much larger AquAdvantage salmon could spell disaster for the wild Atlantic salmon by taking its food and mates.
>
> The FDA concluded the risk of negatively affecting the environment is "extremely remote." It states the salmon will be raised in inland tanks with little to no means of escape, and in the event of escape, the fish wouldn't live long due to the warm temperatures and saltiness of nearby bodies of water. The agency also claims the G.E. salmon would be unlikely to reproduce because they would be sterilized, however, according to the Times, the sterilization method is not foolproof.
>
> The FDA believes the salmon would have no effect on endangered species, including wild Atlantic salmon. Apparently the National Marine Fisheries Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service did not take issue with the FDA's opinion.

## Opponents of "Frankenfish" Vehemently Disagree with the FDA's Assessment

> According to the Huffington Post, critics of the genetically engineered salmon, _"… worry that it could cause human allergies and the eventual decimation of the natural salmon population if it escapes and breeds in the wild."_
>
> Opponents think the FDA should compile a more comprehensive environmental impact statement. They feel not enough samples were studied to conclude that the fish would be safe to eat.
>
> Others opposed to the breeding of engineered animals believe it's an issue of ethics.
>
>> _"The G.E. salmon has no socially redeeming value," _Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of the Center for Food Safety (CFS), a Washington advocacy group opposed to farm biotechnology, said in a statement._ "It's bad for the consumer, bad for the salmon industry and bad for the environment. F.D.A.'s decision is premature and misguided." _
>
> In a December 21st [press release](http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/2012/12/21/obama-administration-snubs-risks-moves-forward-with-ge-salmon-approval/), the CFS blasted the FDA:
>
>> _"The FDA decision ignores calls from more than forty members of the U.S. Congress who have repeatedly urged FDA to conduct more rigorous review of environmental and health safety, and halt any approval process until concerns over risks, transparency and oversight have been fully satisfied. The public filed nearly 400,000 comments demanding FDA reject this application. Additionally, more than 300 environmental, consumer, health and animal welfare organizations, salmon and fishing groups and associations, food companies, chefs and restaurants filed joint statements with FDA opposing approval."_
>
> You can learn more details about the potential risks of genetically engineered salmon at the [Ocean Conservancy](http://www.oceanconservancy.org/our-work/aquaculture/aquaculture-genetically.html), the "Stop GE Fish" page at the [Center for Food Safety](http://ge-fish.org/), and by reading Dr. Mercola's excellent article, [Act Now to Stop Genetically Engineered Fish from Receiving Approval](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/01/08/genetically-engineered-fish.aspx).

## Feeding Salmon to Your Pet

> As some of you may be aware, I don't recommend feeding a lot of fish-based commercial pet foods to your dog or cat. I explain why in [this article](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx).
>
> But since fish are a rich source of [omega-3 fatty acids](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/04/12/coat-and-skin-flakiness-and-irritation-problems-in-pets.aspx), which are essential to your pet's well-being, if you do want to supplement your pet's diet with fish, I suggest you go with sardines packed in water. Sardines don't live long enough to store toxins in their bodies, and they're an excellent source of omega-3s.
>
> I have also always recommended feeding wild caught salmon in rotation with other proteins, however, should G.E. salmon be given the green light, I'll have to revisit my position on this subject. It's entirely possible we won't be able to tell by reading labels whether we're serving our pets (or ourselves) real salmon or "frankenfish."
>
> If you choose not to feed any fish to your dog or cat, I certainly recommend you supplement your pet's diet with krill oil or another omega-3 fatty acid.

Sources:

* [The New York Times, December 21, 2012](http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/business/gene-altered-fish-moves-closer-to-federal-approval.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1356223845-qatvLZoWoOq9R5yPS870MA&)
* [Huffington Post, December 21, 2012](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/aquaadvantage-genetically-modified-salmon-no-threat_n_2347757.html)


**Related Articles:**

&nbsp_place_holder; [If You Love Eating Fish - Now is the Time to Stop This Health Hazard](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/10/06/gmo-salmon-one-step-closer-to-fda-approval.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [Warning - The Very Food Your Pet is Addicted to May Contain This Deadly Preservative](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [The Dangers of Genetically Modified Ingredients in Pet Food](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/11/14/genetically-modified-corn.aspx)

[**&nbsp_place_holder;Comments&nbsp_place_holder;(35)](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#comments)**

URL: http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx

Vero Beach woman rescues 8 pets from house fire

With smoke pouring from the air conditioning vents and flames filling her daughter's bedroom, Pam Dizazio made it out of her burning home and took eight of her loved ones with her Wednesday afternoon.

URL: http://www.topix.com/pets/2013/01/vero-beach-woman-rescues-8-pets-from-house-fire?fromrss=1

If You Feed Salmon to Your Pet (or Eat It Yourself), Please Read This

**By Dr. Becker**

> The week before Christmas, the FDA determined that the first genetically engineered (G.E.) animal - a type of salmon - will have "no significant impact" on the environment, and will be "as safe as food from conventional Atlantic salmon."
>
> The FDA's draft environmental assessment[1](http://healthypets.mercola.com/rss/healthypet-rss.aspx#_edn1) will be open for public comment for two months, but according to the New York Times, it seems likely the salmon will be approved in the not-too-distant future. (Interestingly, the assessment was completed in early May, but wasn't released until after the presidential election in November. According to the NYTimes, proponents of the salmon believe the delay was due to fear by the Obama administration that unfavorable consumer reaction could have an impact on the outcome of the election.)

## According to the FDA, G.E. Salmon is Safe to Eat and No Risk to the Environment

> AquaBounty Technologies is the company that developed the product, called the AquAdvantage salmon. They have been trying to get FDA approval of the salmon for around 15 years.
>
> According to the NYTimes, the AquAdvantage salmon _"… is an Atlantic salmon that contains a growth hormone gene from the Chinook salmon and a genetic switch from the ocean pout, an eel-like creature. The switch keeps the gene on so that the salmon produces growth hormone year round, rather than only during warm weather. The fish reach market weight in about 18 months instead of three years."_
>
> The FDA's environmental analysis of the G.E. salmon looked at whether the fish could escape, adapt to life in the wild, and have a negative impact on the environment. One concern is whether the much larger AquAdvantage salmon could spell disaster for the wild Atlantic salmon by taking its food and mates.
>
> The FDA concluded the risk of negatively affecting the environment is "extremely remote." It states the salmon will be raised in inland tanks with little to no means of escape, and in the event of escape, the fish wouldn't live long due to the warm temperatures and saltiness of nearby bodies of water. The agency also claims the G.E. salmon would be unlikely to reproduce because they would be sterilized, however, according to the Times, the sterilization method is not foolproof.
>
> The FDA believes the salmon would have no effect on endangered species, including wild Atlantic salmon. Apparently the National Marine Fisheries Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service did not take issue with the FDA's opinion.

## Opponents of "Frankenfish" Vehemently Disagree with the FDA's Assessment

> According to the Huffington Post, critics of the genetically engineered salmon, _"… worry that it could cause human allergies and the eventual decimation of the natural salmon population if it escapes and breeds in the wild."_
>
> Opponents think the FDA should compile a more comprehensive environmental impact statement. They feel not enough samples were studied to conclude that the fish would be safe to eat.
>
> Others opposed to the breeding of engineered animals believe it's an issue of ethics.
>
>> _"The G.E. salmon has no socially redeeming value," _Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of the Center for Food Safety (CFS), a Washington advocacy group opposed to farm biotechnology, said in a statement._ "It's bad for the consumer, bad for the salmon industry and bad for the environment. F.D.A.'s decision is premature and misguided." _
>
> In a December 21st [press release](http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/2012/12/21/obama-administration-snubs-risks-moves-forward-with-ge-salmon-approval/), the CFS blasted the FDA:
>
>> _"The FDA decision ignores calls from more than forty members of the U.S. Congress who have repeatedly urged FDA to conduct more rigorous review of environmental and health safety, and halt any approval process until concerns over risks, transparency and oversight have been fully satisfied. The public filed nearly 400,000 comments demanding FDA reject this application. Additionally, more than 300 environmental, consumer, health and animal welfare organizations, salmon and fishing groups and associations, food companies, chefs and restaurants filed joint statements with FDA opposing approval."_
>
> You can learn more details about the potential risks of genetically engineered salmon at the [Ocean Conservancy](http://www.oceanconservancy.org/our-work/aquaculture/aquaculture-genetically.html), the "Stop GE Fish" page at the [Center for Food Safety](http://ge-fish.org/), and by reading Dr. Mercola's excellent article, [Act Now to Stop Genetically Engineered Fish from Receiving Approval](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/01/08/genetically-engineered-fish.aspx).

## Feeding Salmon to Your Pet

> As some of you may be aware, I don't recommend feeding a lot of fish-based commercial pet foods to your dog or cat. I explain why in [this article](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx).
>
> But since fish are a rich source of [omega-3 fatty acids](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/04/12/coat-and-skin-flakiness-and-irritation-problems-in-pets.aspx), which are essential to your pet's well-being, if you do want to supplement your pet's diet with fish, I suggest you go with sardines packed in water. Sardines don't live long enough to store toxins in their bodies, and they're an excellent source of omega-3s.
>
> I have also always recommended feeding wild caught salmon in rotation with other proteins, however, should G.E. salmon be given the green light, I'll have to revisit my position on this subject. It's entirely possible we won't be able to tell by reading labels whether we're serving our pets (or ourselves) real salmon or "frankenfish."
>
> If you choose not to feed any fish to your dog or cat, I certainly recommend you supplement your pet's diet with krill oil or another omega-3 fatty acid.

Sources:

* [The New York Times, December 21, 2012](http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/business/gene-altered-fish-moves-closer-to-federal-approval.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1356223845-qatvLZoWoOq9R5yPS870MA&)
* [Huffington Post, December 21, 2012](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/aquaadvantage-genetically-modified-salmon-no-threat_n_2347757.html)


**Related Articles:**

&nbsp_place_holder; [If You Love Eating Fish - Now is the Time to Stop This Health Hazard](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/10/06/gmo-salmon-one-step-closer-to-fda-approval.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [Warning - The Very Food Your Pet is Addicted to May Contain This Deadly Preservative](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [The Dangers of Genetically Modified Ingredients in Pet Food](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/11/14/genetically-modified-corn.aspx)

[**&nbsp_place_holder;Comments&nbsp_place_holder;(34)](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#comments)**

URL: http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx

If You Feed Salmon to Your Pet (or Eat It Yourself), Please Read This

**By Dr. Becker**

> The week before Christmas, the FDA determined that the first genetically engineered (G.E.) animal - a type of salmon - will have "no significant impact" on the environment, and will be "as safe as food from conventional Atlantic salmon."
>
> The FDA's draft environmental assessment[1](http://healthypets.mercola.com/rss/healthypet-rss.aspx#_edn1) will be open for public comment for two months, but according to the New York Times, it seems likely the salmon will be approved in the not-too-distant future. (Interestingly, the assessment was completed in early May, but wasn't released until after the presidential election in November. According to the NYTimes, proponents of the salmon believe the delay was due to fear by the Obama administration that unfavorable consumer reaction could have an impact on the outcome of the election.)

## According to the FDA, G.E. Salmon is Safe to Eat and No Risk to the Environment

> AquaBounty Technologies is the company that developed the product, called the AquAdvantage salmon. They have been trying to get FDA approval of the salmon for around 15 years.
>
> According to the NYTimes, the AquAdvantage salmon _"… is an Atlantic salmon that contains a growth hormone gene from the Chinook salmon and a genetic switch from the ocean pout, an eel-like creature. The switch keeps the gene on so that the salmon produces growth hormone year round, rather than only during warm weather. The fish reach market weight in about 18 months instead of three years."_
>
> The FDA's environmental analysis of the G.E. salmon looked at whether the fish could escape, adapt to life in the wild, and have a negative impact on the environment. One concern is whether the much larger AquAdvantage salmon could spell disaster for the wild Atlantic salmon by taking its food and mates.
>
> The FDA concluded the risk of negatively affecting the environment is "extremely remote." It states the salmon will be raised in inland tanks with little to no means of escape, and in the event of escape, the fish wouldn't live long due to the warm temperatures and saltiness of nearby bodies of water. The agency also claims the G.E. salmon would be unlikely to reproduce because they would be sterilized, however, according to the Times, the sterilization method is not foolproof.
>
> The FDA believes the salmon would have no effect on endangered species, including wild Atlantic salmon. Apparently the National Marine Fisheries Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service did not take issue with the FDA's opinion.

## Opponents of "Frankenfish" Vehemently Disagree with the FDA's Assessment

> According to the Huffington Post, critics of the genetically engineered salmon, _"… worry that it could cause human allergies and the eventual decimation of the natural salmon population if it escapes and breeds in the wild."_
>
> Opponents think the FDA should compile a more comprehensive environmental impact statement. They feel not enough samples were studied to conclude that the fish would be safe to eat.
>
> Others opposed to the breeding of engineered animals believe it's an issue of ethics.
>
>> _"The G.E. salmon has no socially redeeming value," _Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of the Center for Food Safety (CFS), a Washington advocacy group opposed to farm biotechnology, said in a statement._ "It's bad for the consumer, bad for the salmon industry and bad for the environment. F.D.A.'s decision is premature and misguided." _
>
> In a December 21st [press release](http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/2012/12/21/obama-administration-snubs-risks-moves-forward-with-ge-salmon-approval/), the CFS blasted the FDA:
>
>> _"The FDA decision ignores calls from more than forty members of the U.S. Congress who have repeatedly urged FDA to conduct more rigorous review of environmental and health safety, and halt any approval process until concerns over risks, transparency and oversight have been fully satisfied. The public filed nearly 400,000 comments demanding FDA reject this application. Additionally, more than 300 environmental, consumer, health and animal welfare organizations, salmon and fishing groups and associations, food companies, chefs and restaurants filed joint statements with FDA opposing approval."_
>
> You can learn more details about the potential risks of genetically engineered salmon at the [Ocean Conservancy](http://www.oceanconservancy.org/our-work/aquaculture/aquaculture-genetically.html), the "Stop GE Fish" page at the [Center for Food Safety](http://ge-fish.org/), and by reading Dr. Mercola's excellent article, [Act Now to Stop Genetically Engineered Fish from Receiving Approval](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/01/08/genetically-engineered-fish.aspx).

## Feeding Salmon to Your Pet

> As some of you may be aware, I don't recommend feeding a lot of fish-based commercial pet foods to your dog or cat. I explain why in [this article](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx).
>
> But since fish are a rich source of [omega-3 fatty acids](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/04/12/coat-and-skin-flakiness-and-irritation-problems-in-pets.aspx), which are essential to your pet's well-being, if you do want to supplement your pet's diet with fish, I suggest you go with sardines packed in water. Sardines don't live long enough to store toxins in their bodies, and they're an excellent source of omega-3s.
>
> I have also always recommended feeding wild caught salmon in rotation with other proteins, however, should G.E. salmon be given the green light, I'll have to revisit my position on this subject. It's entirely possible we won't be able to tell by reading labels whether we're serving our pets (or ourselves) real salmon or "frankenfish."
>
> If you choose not to feed any fish to your dog or cat, I certainly recommend you supplement your pet's diet with krill oil or another omega-3 fatty acid.

Sources:

* [The New York Times, December 21, 2012](http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/business/gene-altered-fish-moves-closer-to-federal-approval.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1356223845-qatvLZoWoOq9R5yPS870MA&)
* [Huffington Post, December 21, 2012](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/aquaadvantage-genetically-modified-salmon-no-threat_n_2347757.html)


**Related Articles:**

&nbsp_place_holder; [If You Love Eating Fish - Now is the Time to Stop This Health Hazard](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/10/06/gmo-salmon-one-step-closer-to-fda-approval.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [Warning - The Very Food Your Pet is Addicted to May Contain This Deadly Preservative](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [The Dangers of Genetically Modified Ingredients in Pet Food](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/11/14/genetically-modified-corn.aspx)

[**&nbsp_place_holder;Comments&nbsp_place_holder;(33)](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#comments)**

URL: http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx

Dog owners be vigilent

Dr Donald Murray, of Murrays Veterinary Clinic in Mosgiel, talks to dog owner Melissa Hendry about the risks of algae after four dogs died after drinking water contaminated with toxic algae.

URL: http://www.topix.com/pets/2013/01/dog-owners-be-vigilent?fromrss=1

Labs Named Most Popular Dog In America For 22nd Year

The American Kennel Club says the Labrador Retriever is the nation's most popular dog for the 22nd straight year - for attributes that range from family-friendly pet to search-and-rescue nose.

URL: http://www.topix.com/pets/2013/01/labs-named-most-popular-dog-in-america-for-22nd-year?fromrss=1
Enclosure: http://www.topix.com/bigpic/mini-e42390ffe4e5372c2f1a5069b12fcf66

If You Feed Salmon to Your Pet (or Eat It Yourself), Please Read This

**By Dr. Becker**

> The week before Christmas, the FDA determined that the first genetically engineered (G.E.) animal - a type of salmon - will have "no significant impact" on the environment, and will be "as safe as food from conventional Atlantic salmon."
>
> The FDA's draft environmental assessment[1](http://healthypets.mercola.com/rss/healthypet-rss.aspx#_edn1) will be open for public comment for two months, but according to the New York Times, it seems likely the salmon will be approved in the not-too-distant future. (Interestingly, the assessment was completed in early May, but wasn't released until after the presidential election in November. According to the NYTimes, proponents of the salmon believe the delay was due to fear by the Obama administration that unfavorable consumer reaction could have an impact on the outcome of the election.)

## According to the FDA, G.E. Salmon is Safe to Eat and No Risk to the Environment

> AquaBounty Technologies is the company that developed the product, called the AquAdvantage salmon. They have been trying to get FDA approval of the salmon for around 15 years.
>
> According to the NYTimes, the AquAdvantage salmon _"… is an Atlantic salmon that contains a growth hormone gene from the Chinook salmon and a genetic switch from the ocean pout, an eel-like creature. The switch keeps the gene on so that the salmon produces growth hormone year round, rather than only during warm weather. The fish reach market weight in about 18 months instead of three years."_
>
> The FDA's environmental analysis of the G.E. salmon looked at whether the fish could escape, adapt to life in the wild, and have a negative impact on the environment. One concern is whether the much larger AquAdvantage salmon could spell disaster for the wild Atlantic salmon by taking its food and mates.
>
> The FDA concluded the risk of negatively affecting the environment is "extremely remote." It states the salmon will be raised in inland tanks with little to no means of escape, and in the event of escape, the fish wouldn't live long due to the warm temperatures and saltiness of nearby bodies of water. The agency also claims the G.E. salmon would be unlikely to reproduce because they would be sterilized, however, according to the Times, the sterilization method is not foolproof.
>
> The FDA believes the salmon would have no effect on endangered species, including wild Atlantic salmon. Apparently the National Marine Fisheries Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service did not take issue with the FDA's opinion.

## Opponents of "Frankenfish" Vehemently Disagree with the FDA's Assessment

> According to the Huffington Post, critics of the genetically engineered salmon, _"… worry that it could cause human allergies and the eventual decimation of the natural salmon population if it escapes and breeds in the wild."_
>
> Opponents think the FDA should compile a more comprehensive environmental impact statement. They feel not enough samples were studied to conclude that the fish would be safe to eat.
>
> Others opposed to the breeding of engineered animals believe it's an issue of ethics.
>
>> _"The G.E. salmon has no socially redeeming value," _Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of the Center for Food Safety (CFS), a Washington advocacy group opposed to farm biotechnology, said in a statement._ "It's bad for the consumer, bad for the salmon industry and bad for the environment. F.D.A.'s decision is premature and misguided." _
>
> In a December 21st [press release](http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/2012/12/21/obama-administration-snubs-risks-moves-forward-with-ge-salmon-approval/), the CFS blasted the FDA:
>
>> _"The FDA decision ignores calls from more than forty members of the U.S. Congress who have repeatedly urged FDA to conduct more rigorous review of environmental and health safety, and halt any approval process until concerns over risks, transparency and oversight have been fully satisfied. The public filed nearly 400,000 comments demanding FDA reject this application. Additionally, more than 300 environmental, consumer, health and animal welfare organizations, salmon and fishing groups and associations, food companies, chefs and restaurants filed joint statements with FDA opposing approval."_
>
> You can learn more details about the potential risks of genetically engineered salmon at the [Ocean Conservancy](http://www.oceanconservancy.org/our-work/aquaculture/aquaculture-genetically.html), the "Stop GE Fish" page at the [Center for Food Safety](http://ge-fish.org/), and by reading Dr. Mercola's excellent article, [Act Now to Stop Genetically Engineered Fish from Receiving Approval](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/01/08/genetically-engineered-fish.aspx).

## Feeding Salmon to Your Pet

> As some of you may be aware, I don't recommend feeding a lot of fish-based commercial pet foods to your dog or cat. I explain why in [this article](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx).
>
> But since fish are a rich source of [omega-3 fatty acids](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/04/12/coat-and-skin-flakiness-and-irritation-problems-in-pets.aspx), which are essential to your pet's well-being, if you do want to supplement your pet's diet with fish, I suggest you go with sardines packed in water. Sardines don't live long enough to store toxins in their bodies, and they're an excellent source of omega-3s.
>
> I have also always recommended feeding wild caught salmon in rotation with other proteins, however, should G.E. salmon be given the green light, I'll have to revisit my position on this subject. It's entirely possible we won't be able to tell by reading labels whether we're serving our pets (or ourselves) real salmon or "frankenfish."
>
> If you choose not to feed any fish to your dog or cat, I certainly recommend you supplement your pet's diet with krill oil or another omega-3 fatty acid.

Sources:

* [The New York Times, December 21, 2012](http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/business/gene-altered-fish-moves-closer-to-federal-approval.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1356223845-qatvLZoWoOq9R5yPS870MA&)
* [Huffington Post, December 21, 2012](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/aquaadvantage-genetically-modified-salmon-no-threat_n_2347757.html)


**Related Articles:**

&nbsp_place_holder; [If You Love Eating Fish - Now is the Time to Stop This Health Hazard](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/10/06/gmo-salmon-one-step-closer-to-fda-approval.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [Warning - The Very Food Your Pet is Addicted to May Contain This Deadly Preservative](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [The Dangers of Genetically Modified Ingredients in Pet Food](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/11/14/genetically-modified-corn.aspx)

[**&nbsp_place_holder;Comments&nbsp_place_holder;(32)](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#comments)**

URL: http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx

If You Feed Salmon to Your Pet (or Eat It Yourself), Please Read This

**By Dr. Becker**

> The week before Christmas, the FDA determined that the first genetically engineered (G.E.) animal - a type of salmon - will have "no significant impact" on the environment, and will be "as safe as food from conventional Atlantic salmon."
>
> The FDA's draft environmental assessment[1](http://healthypets.mercola.com/rss/healthypet-rss.aspx#_edn1) will be open for public comment for two months, but according to the New York Times, it seems likely the salmon will be approved in the not-too-distant future. (Interestingly, the assessment was completed in early May, but wasn't released until after the presidential election in November. According to the NYTimes, proponents of the salmon believe the delay was due to fear by the Obama administration that unfavorable consumer reaction could have an impact on the outcome of the election.)

## According to the FDA, G.E. Salmon is Safe to Eat and No Risk to the Environment

> AquaBounty Technologies is the company that developed the product, called the AquAdvantage salmon. They have been trying to get FDA approval of the salmon for around 15 years.
>
> According to the NYTimes, the AquAdvantage salmon _"… is an Atlantic salmon that contains a growth hormone gene from the Chinook salmon and a genetic switch from the ocean pout, an eel-like creature. The switch keeps the gene on so that the salmon produces growth hormone year round, rather than only during warm weather. The fish reach market weight in about 18 months instead of three years."_
>
> The FDA's environmental analysis of the G.E. salmon looked at whether the fish could escape, adapt to life in the wild, and have a negative impact on the environment. One concern is whether the much larger AquAdvantage salmon could spell disaster for the wild Atlantic salmon by taking its food and mates.
>
> The FDA concluded the risk of negatively affecting the environment is "extremely remote." It states the salmon will be raised in inland tanks with little to no means of escape, and in the event of escape, the fish wouldn't live long due to the warm temperatures and saltiness of nearby bodies of water. The agency also claims the G.E. salmon would be unlikely to reproduce because they would be sterilized, however, according to the Times, the sterilization method is not foolproof.
>
> The FDA believes the salmon would have no effect on endangered species, including wild Atlantic salmon. Apparently the National Marine Fisheries Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service did not take issue with the FDA's opinion.

## Opponents of "Frankenfish" Vehemently Disagree with the FDA's Assessment

> According to the Huffington Post, critics of the genetically engineered salmon, _"… worry that it could cause human allergies and the eventual decimation of the natural salmon population if it escapes and breeds in the wild."_
>
> Opponents think the FDA should compile a more comprehensive environmental impact statement. They feel not enough samples were studied to conclude that the fish would be safe to eat.
>
> Others opposed to the breeding of engineered animals believe it's an issue of ethics.
>
>> _"The G.E. salmon has no socially redeeming value," _Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of the Center for Food Safety (CFS), a Washington advocacy group opposed to farm biotechnology, said in a statement._ "It's bad for the consumer, bad for the salmon industry and bad for the environment. F.D.A.'s decision is premature and misguided." _
>
> In a December 21st [press release](http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/2012/12/21/obama-administration-snubs-risks-moves-forward-with-ge-salmon-approval/), the CFS blasted the FDA:
>
>> _"The FDA decision ignores calls from more than forty members of the U.S. Congress who have repeatedly urged FDA to conduct more rigorous review of environmental and health safety, and halt any approval process until concerns over risks, transparency and oversight have been fully satisfied. The public filed nearly 400,000 comments demanding FDA reject this application. Additionally, more than 300 environmental, consumer, health and animal welfare organizations, salmon and fishing groups and associations, food companies, chefs and restaurants filed joint statements with FDA opposing approval."_
>
> You can learn more details about the potential risks of genetically engineered salmon at the [Ocean Conservancy](http://www.oceanconservancy.org/our-work/aquaculture/aquaculture-genetically.html), the "Stop GE Fish" page at the [Center for Food Safety](http://ge-fish.org/), and by reading Dr. Mercola's excellent article, [Act Now to Stop Genetically Engineered Fish from Receiving Approval](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/01/08/genetically-engineered-fish.aspx).

## Feeding Salmon to Your Pet

> As some of you may be aware, I don't recommend feeding a lot of fish-based commercial pet foods to your dog or cat. I explain why in [this article](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx).
>
> But since fish are a rich source of [omega-3 fatty acids](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/04/12/coat-and-skin-flakiness-and-irritation-problems-in-pets.aspx), which are essential to your pet's well-being, if you do want to supplement your pet's diet with fish, I suggest you go with sardines packed in water. Sardines don't live long enough to store toxins in their bodies, and they're an excellent source of omega-3s.
>
> I have also always recommended feeding wild caught salmon in rotation with other proteins, however, should G.E. salmon be given the green light, I'll have to revisit my position on this subject. It's entirely possible we won't be able to tell by reading labels whether we're serving our pets (or ourselves) real salmon or "frankenfish."
>
> If you choose not to feed any fish to your dog or cat, I certainly recommend you supplement your pet's diet with krill oil or another omega-3 fatty acid.

Sources:

* [The New York Times, December 21, 2012](http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/business/gene-altered-fish-moves-closer-to-federal-approval.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1356223845-qatvLZoWoOq9R5yPS870MA&)
* [Huffington Post, December 21, 2012](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/aquaadvantage-genetically-modified-salmon-no-threat_n_2347757.html)


**Related Articles:**

&nbsp_place_holder; [If You Love Eating Fish - Now is the Time to Stop This Health Hazard](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/10/06/gmo-salmon-one-step-closer-to-fda-approval.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [Warning - The Very Food Your Pet is Addicted to May Contain This Deadly Preservative](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [The Dangers of Genetically Modified Ingredients in Pet Food](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/11/14/genetically-modified-corn.aspx)

[**&nbsp_place_holder;Comments&nbsp_place_holder;(31)](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#comments)**

URL: http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx

Kennel Club: Americans are still crazy for Labs

30, 2013. . A German Shepard named Commander attends a news conference at the American Kennel Club in New York, Wednesday, Jan.

URL: http://www.topix.com/pets/2013/01/kennel-club-americans-are-still-crazy-for-labs?fromrss=1

If You Feed Salmon to Your Pet (or Eat It Yourself), Please Read This

**By Dr. Becker**

> The week before Christmas, the FDA determined that the first genetically engineered (G.E.) animal - a type of salmon - will have "no significant impact" on the environment, and will be "as safe as food from conventional Atlantic salmon."
>
> The FDA's draft environmental assessment[1](http://healthypets.mercola.com/rss/healthypet-rss.aspx#_edn1) will be open for public comment for two months, but according to the New York Times, it seems likely the salmon will be approved in the not-too-distant future. (Interestingly, the assessment was completed in early May, but wasn't released until after the presidential election in November. According to the NYTimes, proponents of the salmon believe the delay was due to fear by the Obama administration that unfavorable consumer reaction could have an impact on the outcome of the election.)

## According to the FDA, G.E. Salmon is Safe to Eat and No Risk to the Environment

> AquaBounty Technologies is the company that developed the product, called the AquAdvantage salmon. They have been trying to get FDA approval of the salmon for around 15 years.
>
> According to the NYTimes, the AquAdvantage salmon _"… is an Atlantic salmon that contains a growth hormone gene from the Chinook salmon and a genetic switch from the ocean pout, an eel-like creature. The switch keeps the gene on so that the salmon produces growth hormone year round, rather than only during warm weather. The fish reach market weight in about 18 months instead of three years."_
>
> The FDA's environmental analysis of the G.E. salmon looked at whether the fish could escape, adapt to life in the wild, and have a negative impact on the environment. One concern is whether the much larger AquAdvantage salmon could spell disaster for the wild Atlantic salmon by taking its food and mates.
>
> The FDA concluded the risk of negatively affecting the environment is "extremely remote." It states the salmon will be raised in inland tanks with little to no means of escape, and in the event of escape, the fish wouldn't live long due to the warm temperatures and saltiness of nearby bodies of water. The agency also claims the G.E. salmon would be unlikely to reproduce because they would be sterilized, however, according to the Times, the sterilization method is not foolproof.
>
> The FDA believes the salmon would have no effect on endangered species, including wild Atlantic salmon. Apparently the National Marine Fisheries Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service did not take issue with the FDA's opinion.

## Opponents of "Frankenfish" Vehemently Disagree with the FDA's Assessment

> According to the Huffington Post, critics of the genetically engineered salmon, _"… worry that it could cause human allergies and the eventual decimation of the natural salmon population if it escapes and breeds in the wild."_
>
> Opponents think the FDA should compile a more comprehensive environmental impact statement. They feel not enough samples were studied to conclude that the fish would be safe to eat.
>
> Others opposed to the breeding of engineered animals believe it's an issue of ethics.
>
>> _"The G.E. salmon has no socially redeeming value," _Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of the Center for Food Safety (CFS), a Washington advocacy group opposed to farm biotechnology, said in a statement._ "It's bad for the consumer, bad for the salmon industry and bad for the environment. F.D.A.'s decision is premature and misguided." _
>
> In a December 21st [press release](http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/2012/12/21/obama-administration-snubs-risks-moves-forward-with-ge-salmon-approval/), the CFS blasted the FDA:
>
>> _"The FDA decision ignores calls from more than forty members of the U.S. Congress who have repeatedly urged FDA to conduct more rigorous review of environmental and health safety, and halt any approval process until concerns over risks, transparency and oversight have been fully satisfied. The public filed nearly 400,000 comments demanding FDA reject this application. Additionally, more than 300 environmental, consumer, health and animal welfare organizations, salmon and fishing groups and associations, food companies, chefs and restaurants filed joint statements with FDA opposing approval."_
>
> You can learn more details about the potential risks of genetically engineered salmon at the [Ocean Conservancy](http://www.oceanconservancy.org/our-work/aquaculture/aquaculture-genetically.html), the "Stop GE Fish" page at the [Center for Food Safety](http://ge-fish.org/), and by reading Dr. Mercola's excellent article, [Act Now to Stop Genetically Engineered Fish from Receiving Approval](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/01/08/genetically-engineered-fish.aspx).

## Feeding Salmon to Your Pet

> As some of you may be aware, I don't recommend feeding a lot of fish-based commercial pet foods to your dog or cat. I explain why in [this article](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx).
>
> But since fish are a rich source of [omega-3 fatty acids](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/04/12/coat-and-skin-flakiness-and-irritation-problems-in-pets.aspx), which are essential to your pet's well-being, if you do want to supplement your pet's diet with fish, I suggest you go with sardines packed in water. Sardines don't live long enough to store toxins in their bodies, and they're an excellent source of omega-3s.
>
> I have also always recommended feeding wild caught salmon in rotation with other proteins, however, should G.E. salmon be given the green light, I'll have to revisit my position on this subject. It's entirely possible we won't be able to tell by reading labels whether we're serving our pets (or ourselves) real salmon or "frankenfish."
>
> If you choose not to feed any fish to your dog or cat, I certainly recommend you supplement your pet's diet with krill oil or another omega-3 fatty acid.

Sources:

* [The New York Times, December 21, 2012](http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/business/gene-altered-fish-moves-closer-to-federal-approval.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1356223845-qatvLZoWoOq9R5yPS870MA&)
* [Huffington Post, December 21, 2012](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/aquaadvantage-genetically-modified-salmon-no-threat_n_2347757.html)


**Related Articles:**

&nbsp_place_holder; [If You Love Eating Fish - Now is the Time to Stop This Health Hazard](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/10/06/gmo-salmon-one-step-closer-to-fda-approval.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [Warning - The Very Food Your Pet is Addicted to May Contain This Deadly Preservative](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [The Dangers of Genetically Modified Ingredients in Pet Food](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/11/14/genetically-modified-corn.aspx)

[**&nbsp_place_holder;Comments&nbsp_place_holder;(30)](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#comments)**

URL: http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx

Tributes paid to Portesham teenager after riding accident

Talented horsewoman Ella Pallister suffered the fatal injuries while taking part in a British Show Jumping Association contest at the college near [Dorchester](http://www.topix.com/uk/dorchester) on Sunday.

URL: http://www.topix.com/pets/2013/01/tributes-paid-to-portesham-teenager-after-riding-accident?fromrss=1
Enclosure: http://www.topix.com/bigpic/mini-e29a62d68c8ae0ae0b93c0e46192007c

If You Feed Salmon to Your Pet (or Eat It Yourself), Please Read This

**By Dr. Becker**

> The week before Christmas, the FDA determined that the first genetically engineered (G.E.) animal - a type of salmon - will have "no significant impact" on the environment, and will be "as safe as food from conventional Atlantic salmon."
>
> The FDA's draft environmental assessment[1](http://healthypets.mercola.com/rss/healthypet-rss.aspx#_edn1) will be open for public comment for two months, but according to the New York Times, it seems likely the salmon will be approved in the not-too-distant future. (Interestingly, the assessment was completed in early May, but wasn't released until after the presidential election in November. According to the NYTimes, proponents of the salmon believe the delay was due to fear by the Obama administration that unfavorable consumer reaction could have an impact on the outcome of the election.)

## According to the FDA, G.E. Salmon is Safe to Eat and No Risk to the Environment

> AquaBounty Technologies is the company that developed the product, called the AquAdvantage salmon. They have been trying to get FDA approval of the salmon for around 15 years.
>
> According to the NYTimes, the AquAdvantage salmon _"… is an Atlantic salmon that contains a growth hormone gene from the Chinook salmon and a genetic switch from the ocean pout, an eel-like creature. The switch keeps the gene on so that the salmon produces growth hormone year round, rather than only during warm weather. The fish reach market weight in about 18 months instead of three years."_
>
> The FDA's environmental analysis of the G.E. salmon looked at whether the fish could escape, adapt to life in the wild, and have a negative impact on the environment. One concern is whether the much larger AquAdvantage salmon could spell disaster for the wild Atlantic salmon by taking its food and mates.
>
> The FDA concluded the risk of negatively affecting the environment is "extremely remote." It states the salmon will be raised in inland tanks with little to no means of escape, and in the event of escape, the fish wouldn't live long due to the warm temperatures and saltiness of nearby bodies of water. The agency also claims the G.E. salmon would be unlikely to reproduce because they would be sterilized, however, according to the Times, the sterilization method is not foolproof.
>
> The FDA believes the salmon would have no effect on endangered species, including wild Atlantic salmon. Apparently the National Marine Fisheries Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service did not take issue with the FDA's opinion.

## Opponents of "Frankenfish" Vehemently Disagree with the FDA's Assessment

> According to the Huffington Post, critics of the genetically engineered salmon, _"… worry that it could cause human allergies and the eventual decimation of the natural salmon population if it escapes and breeds in the wild."_
>
> Opponents think the FDA should compile a more comprehensive environmental impact statement. They feel not enough samples were studied to conclude that the fish would be safe to eat.
>
> Others opposed to the breeding of engineered animals believe it's an issue of ethics.
>
>> _"The G.E. salmon has no socially redeeming value," _Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of the Center for Food Safety (CFS), a Washington advocacy group opposed to farm biotechnology, said in a statement._ "It's bad for the consumer, bad for the salmon industry and bad for the environment. F.D.A.'s decision is premature and misguided." _
>
> In a December 21st [press release](http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/2012/12/21/obama-administration-snubs-risks-moves-forward-with-ge-salmon-approval/), the CFS blasted the FDA:
>
>> _"The FDA decision ignores calls from more than forty members of the U.S. Congress who have repeatedly urged FDA to conduct more rigorous review of environmental and health safety, and halt any approval process until concerns over risks, transparency and oversight have been fully satisfied. The public filed nearly 400,000 comments demanding FDA reject this application. Additionally, more than 300 environmental, consumer, health and animal welfare organizations, salmon and fishing groups and associations, food companies, chefs and restaurants filed joint statements with FDA opposing approval."_
>
> You can learn more details about the potential risks of genetically engineered salmon at the [Ocean Conservancy](http://www.oceanconservancy.org/our-work/aquaculture/aquaculture-genetically.html), the "Stop GE Fish" page at the [Center for Food Safety](http://ge-fish.org/), and by reading Dr. Mercola's excellent article, [Act Now to Stop Genetically Engineered Fish from Receiving Approval](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/01/08/genetically-engineered-fish.aspx).

## Feeding Salmon to Your Pet

> As some of you may be aware, I don't recommend feeding a lot of fish-based commercial pet foods to your dog or cat. I explain why in [this article](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx).
>
> But since fish are a rich source of [omega-3 fatty acids](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/04/12/coat-and-skin-flakiness-and-irritation-problems-in-pets.aspx), which are essential to your pet's well-being, if you do want to supplement your pet's diet with fish, I suggest you go with sardines packed in water. Sardines don't live long enough to store toxins in their bodies, and they're an excellent source of omega-3s.
>
> I have also always recommended feeding wild caught salmon in rotation with other proteins, however, should G.E. salmon be given the green light, I'll have to revisit my position on this subject. It's entirely possible we won't be able to tell by reading labels whether we're serving our pets (or ourselves) real salmon or "frankenfish."
>
> If you choose not to feed any fish to your dog or cat, I certainly recommend you supplement your pet's diet with krill oil or another omega-3 fatty acid.

Sources:

* [The New York Times, December 21, 2012](http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/business/gene-altered-fish-moves-closer-to-federal-approval.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1356223845-qatvLZoWoOq9R5yPS870MA&)
* [Huffington Post, December 21, 2012](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/aquaadvantage-genetically-modified-salmon-no-threat_n_2347757.html)


**Related Articles:**

&nbsp_place_holder; [If You Love Eating Fish - Now is the Time to Stop This Health Hazard](http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/10/06/gmo-salmon-one-step-closer-to-fda-approval.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [Warning - The Very Food Your Pet is Addicted to May Contain This Deadly Preservative](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/01/03/fish-as-a-protein-source.aspx)

&nbsp_place_holder; [The Dangers of Genetically Modified Ingredients in Pet Food](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/11/14/genetically-modified-corn.aspx)

[**&nbsp_place_holder;Comments&nbsp_place_holder;(29)](http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx?ShowAllComments=True#comments)**

URL: http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/01/30/genetically-engineered-salmon.aspx